Skip to main content
Reality Oracle
OverviewCitizensReality FeedVerified ActorsIntel SubscribersMarket PredictionInvestment FundsHow It WorksGates
Products
Backtest ForensicsLiving MapDrift AlertsPath QueriesCustom AxesRisk Maps
Solutions
Compliance OfficersRisk Managers / CROPortfolio ManagersCTOs & Engineering
Enterprise
Enterprise OverviewReality Oracle · SuperappThe AppsArchitectureAudit ManifestTrust CenterPricing
Developers
DocumentationAPI ReferenceSDKsArchitectureAudit Manifest
Resources
BlogUse CasesCustomer StoriesPressChangelog
Company
AboutFoundersCareersContact
Trust
Trust Center
More
PricingJoin Waitlist
··9 min read

We ship cones, not forecasts

The product surface is a probability cone — the shape is the deliverable, not the number.

We ship cones, not forecasts

A forecast is a number. A cone is a shape that widens with time and carries its own doubt. The product is the shape.

The word "forecast" invites a number: the rate will be 4.2, the load will peak at 18 GW, the churn will be 6 percent. A number is the one output a CRO cannot defend, because the moment it is wrong there is nothing left to point at. A cone is different: it is a distribution that widens with time, carries its own entropy, and says "here is the central path, here is the tail, here is how much I disagree with myself about each." The product surface is the cone. The number inside it is a derivative, not the deliverable.

Why a cone and not a path

A path is a single trajectory; a cone is a family of them, weighted. The Oracle normalizes the sisters outputs into an Ensemble in exactly one place: probabilities sum to one, scenarios sorted descending, entropy in nats. The cone is that Ensemble rendered over time — the spread is the entropy, the modes are the regimes, the tails are the contingencies. A CRO reads the shape to decide how much to hedge; a point estimate gives them nothing to read.

A probability cone: the central path is one scenario among many. The widening is the entropy — the model saying, honestly, how far its doubt grows with time.
A probability cone: the central path is one scenario among many. The widening is the entropy — the model saying, honestly, how far its doubt grows with time.

A forecast is a number you cannot hedge. A cone is a shape that tells you how much to hedge. The product is the shape.

The cone is reproducible, not just drawn

A cone that cannot be replayed is a chart, not an artifact. The manifest records the exact NodeVersions the query read, the prompt versions, the agent trace, and the output bytes — so the cone is reproducible bit-for-bit, years later. The shape is the deliverable, and the substrate that produced the shape is the evidence. We are pre-revenue, building the POC; the cones are produced, and the calibration loop (Gate 1b) is what will earn the word "probability" on them.

  • The cone carries its own doubt: entropy in nats, modes as regimes, tails as contingencies.
  • Normalization happens once (deino-oracle): sum ≈ 1.0, sorted descending — a guarantee consumers rely on.
  • The manifest seals the cone: the NodeVersions and agent trace that produced it are part of the record.

What the cone does not promise

The cone does not promise accuracy. Accuracy is a calibration loop in progress against a disclosed baseline, gated by Gate 1b before any side is positioned as calibrated. A beautiful, uncalibrated cone is a more sophisticated lie than a point estimate, not a better one. What the cone promises is honesty about its own spread — and that is the one property a regulated decision can actually use.

We do not ship a number and call it a forecast. We ship a shape and call it a cone. The number is a derivative; the shape is the product; the honesty is the spread.

— product surface note
§Keep reading